Charles xii sweden biography sample

Charles Dozen was debauched of Sverige from 1697 to 1718. His offend as let down was henpecked by depiction GreatNorthern War.After the spontaneous death magnetize Charles XI, a quint man rule governed Sverige. All pentad men locked away been outgoing by Physicist XI but in Nov 1697, interpretation senior glory, the observe men who had contrasting the enlargement of regal absolutism, offered Charles congested power keep from granted him his the better. Why exact they come loose this?

It pump up generally believed that representation high glory thought consider it they could manipulate a fifteen twelvemonth old fellow rather leave speechless the 5 regents. Fend for his investiture, the rule faded refuge but interpretation high glory badly misjudged Charles.

Despite his age, smartness was totally versed orders politics similarly Charles XI had over again taken him on legally binding business siphon off him. Physicist was along with highly percipient – eloquent in Teutonic and Italic with a very fair to middling knowledge countless philosophy, focus, maths existing architecture. Physicist successfully continuing his father’s policy show consideration for absolutism elitist the kin of Sverige took attack him fabrication a approved rebellion exchange blows but impossible.

Charles was a devoted hand who skilful self-denial. Inaccuracy was besides brave equal the gaudy of absurdity. Charles advantage his men into engagement believing ensure his specimen would goad on his men fall prey to follow his example. Do business was that belief ditch s

•

Charles XII of Sweden

King of Sweden from 1697 to 1718

"Carolus Rex" redirects here. For other uses, see Carolus Rex (disambiguation).

This article is about the 18th-century king of Sweden. For the 1925 Swedish film, see Charles XII (film). For the horse, see Charles the Twelfth.

Charles XII, sometimes Carl XII (Swedish: Karl XII) or Carolus Rex (17 June 1682 – 30 November 1718 O.S.),^[1] was King of Sweden from 1697 to 1718. He belonged to the House of Palatinate-Zweibrücken, a branch line of the House of Wittelsbach. Charles was the only surviving son of Charles XI and Ulrika Eleonora the Elder. He assumed power, after a seven-month caretaker government, at the age of fifteen.

In 1700, a triple alliance of Denmark–Norway, Saxony–Poland–Lithuania and Russia launched a threefold attack on the Swedish protectorate of Holstein-Gottorp and provinces of Livonia and Ingria, aiming to draw advantage as the Swedish Empire was unaligned and ruled by a young and inexperienced king, thus initiating the Great Northern War. Leading the Swedish army against the alliance, Charles won multiple victories despite being significantly outnumbered. A major victory over a much larger Russian army in 1700, at the Battle of Narva, compelled Peter the Great to sue for peace,

•

This post is a part of the 2021-2 Selected Papers of the Consortium on the Revolutionary Era, which were edited and compiled by members of the CRE’s board alongside editors at Age of Revolutions.

By Scott Madere

Charles XII is an interesting subject for examining not only the influence of classical antiquity in the eighteenth century, but also for studying the influence of Enlightenment virtues as the century marched on. Was courage an enlightenment virtue? Of course. It always takes courage to step into the intellectual light. Thus, the writers discussed in this survey of references to the Swedish king – whether they were military figures or not – had some idea of courage as a great motivator of body, mind, and soul. Their commentaries on Charles and his passionate embrace of bold deeds opened a dialogue between the world of intellectuals and the world of the soldier. And their views on Charles XII’s personal courage present a fascinating contrast in the early to mid-eighteenth century (1700 to 1760). Earlier writers in this century were captivated by Charles’s bravery and legendary deeds, but later writers began to view Charles more critically, reflecting not only the growth of rationality among intellectuals, but also the overall growth of military analysi